On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote:
>
> Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
> the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?
I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you
were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new
patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is
additional).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
