On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 11:40 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On a side note i think this scheme also fit well with gpu having > several context and which doesn't need big validation (read > nv gpu). Yeah, I want to make sure we have a simple model that supports multi-context hardware while also avoiding failing over badly when we have more users than hardware contexts. -- [email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: "Jerome Glisse" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- From: "Jerome Glisse" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CIFS: make sec=none force an anonymous mount
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- Index(es):
 |