Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 11:40 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:

> On a side note i think this scheme also fit well with gpu having
> several context and which doesn't need big validation (read
> nv gpu).

Yeah, I want to make sure we have a simple model that supports
multi-context hardware while also avoiding failing over badly when we
have more users than hardware contexts.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: "Dave Airlie" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: "Jerome Glisse" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
    • From: "Jerome Glisse" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CIFS: make sec=none force an anonymous mount
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 14/22] pollfs: pollable futex
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]