Hi,
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This finally renames the thread_info field in task structure to stack,
> > so that the assumptions about this field are gone and archs have more
> > freedom about placing the thread_info structure.
>
> It needed this build fix:
>
> --- a/include/asm-x86_64/system.h~rename-thread_info-to-stack-fix
> +++ a/include/asm-x86_64/system.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> [threadrsp] "i" (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.rsp)), \
> [ti_flags] "i" (offsetof(struct thread_info, flags)),\
> [tif_fork] "i" (TIF_FORK), \
> - [thread_info] "i" (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread_info)), \
> + [thread_info] "i" (offsetof(struct task_struct, stack)), \
> [pda_pcurrent] "i" (offsetof(struct x8664_pda, pcurrent)) \
> : "memory", "cc" __EXTRA_CLOBBER)
>
> _
>
>
> It is unpleasing that this code is forced to implicitly assume that the
> thing pointed to by task_struct.stack has type `struct thread_info'.
>
> Are we sure this patch is a good thing?
Assembler code is difficult to wrap, there are more places where assembler
code assumes that the thread_info is at the start of the stack.
Anyway, in this case it looks a little weird that TIF_FORK needs to be
cleared at every context switch, other archs setup a different return
address (usually ret_from_fork) and then finish scheduling by calling
schedule_tail().
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]