Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks

Bill Irwin wrote:
> I had the same question about yours and just brute-force merged. Not a
> big deal for me to rediff against whatever everyone's working off of.
>   

I picked up one version of your patches you posted a couple of days ago,
but I guess you've posted the series multiple times, presumably with
differences.

How about posting the series again and I can test it out?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Bill Irwin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Bill Irwin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Bill Irwin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] synclink_gt use dynamic tty device registration
• Next by Date: Appletouch is gone!
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]