Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks

Bill Irwin wrote:
>> Updated patch follows. Please add your Signed-off-by: if it meets your
>> approval;

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:01:05PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> What does it apply to?  I'm getting conflicts if I replace my patch with
> this.  Or does it replace one of your patches?

I had the same question about yours and just brute-force merged. Not a
big deal for me to rediff against whatever everyone's working off of.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Bill Irwin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Kconfig: no userspace I/O on s390.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix suspend/resume with dynamically allocated irq stacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]