H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I don't know if that would break any programs that are currently
> bypassing the setup. The existing setup protocol definitely allows
> invoking an entry point which isn't 0x100000 (rather, the 32-bit
> entrypoint is defined by code32_start); I'm not sure how Eric's
> relocatable kernel patches (2.05 protocol) affect that, mostly because I
> haven't seen any boot loaders which actually use it so I can't comment
> on what their code looks like.
Yes, I'd expect that code32_start would point into the ELF text
segment. You could align things so that the entrypoint is still
actually 0x100000, or bump it up a bit to fit the ELF headers. I have
to admit I don't quite understand how all that fits together at the moment.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [0/22] x86 candidate patches for review II: 64bit relocatable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] synclink_gt add compat_ioctl
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):
 |