Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans

Am 02.05.2007 19:49 schrieb Andi Kleen:
> And also I think when something is merged it should have some users in tree.

Isn't that a circular dependency?

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: [email protected]
Bonn, Germany
- Undetected errors are handled as if no error occurred. (IBM) -

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Current SLUB Tree
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21-git4 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]