On Wed, 2 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote: > And then there's patches such as kmemleak which would need to target > all three. Plus it doesn't really make sense for users to select > between three competiting implementations. Please don't take away our > high hopes of getting rid of mm/slab.c Christoph =) You too, Brutus ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- Prev by Date: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/6] firewire: SBP-2 highlevel driver
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
- Index(es):
 |