On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> noooo, we don't want competing slab allocators, please. We should get slub
> working well on all architectures then remove slab completely. Having to
> maintain both slab.c and slub.c would be awful.
Owww... You throw my roadmap out of the window and may create too
high expectations of SLUB.
I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been
dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it
will be much easier once the cleanups are in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
