On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:54 -0400, Peter Keilty wrote:
> john stultz wrote:
> >On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:26 -0400, Peter Keilty wrote:
> >>From: Peter Keilty <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>Initial ia64 conversion to the generic timekeeping/clocksource code.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Peter Keilty <[email protected]>
> >>Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>
> >>
> > Thanks so much for pushing this on! I suspect this patch needs to be
> >updated a touch, as I'm not sure if it still compiles in light of recent
> >changes...
> >
> You are correct, you need patch 3/3 for it to compile and run.
> I did a patch to the orginal patch, thought that was correct thing to do.
> But I can make a new patch 1 from the orginal of ours and my #3.
> I would also make an update to the #2 patch from #3 for ntp correct change.
> That would be just 2 patches then, the enable_ia64 and remove_interpolater.
> What do you think?
Yep. That sounds like the right path to me. Its a good idea to make sure
your patch set compiles each step of the way, so later folks can
properly bisect through it looking for other issues.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
