Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
> If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so
> ambiguous. 

Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
    • From: Dmitry Krivoschekov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
    • From: Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
    • From: Dmitry Krivoschekov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
    • From: Paul Sokolovsky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
    • From: Dmitry Krivoschekov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Natsemi DP83815 driver spaming
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
• Next by thread: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]