Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.

Hi.

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:46 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> ..
> > Yeah. It turns out that I was still on WS 6 beta 1. Upgrading to beta 2
> > made the problem go away.
> 
> Then you're still behind.  They've had a WS6 RC available for the past week.

Or I'm confused about the name :) Build 44426 is what I have. Sorry :)

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/5] Add LZO compression support to the kernel
• Next by Date: [PATCH 3/5] jffs2: Add a "favourlzo" compression mode to jffs2
• Previous by thread: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
• Next by thread: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]