Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.

Nigel Cunningham wrote:
..

Yeah. It turns out that I was still on WS 6 beta 1. Upgrading to beta 2
made the problem go away.

Then you're still behind.  They've had a WS6 RC available for the past week.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [GFS2] fix bz 231369, gfs2 will oops if you specify an invalid mount option [2/34]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the 2G/2G split.
• Previous by thread: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
• Next by thread: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]