Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 12:27 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
>> Remove #defines, add enum for PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>> include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 7 +------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> ===================================================================
>> Index: linux/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h
>> +++ linux/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum paravirt_lazy_mode {
>> PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE = 0,
>> PARAVIRT_LAZY_MMU = 1,
>> PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU = 2,
>> + PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH = 3,
>> };
>>
>> struct paravirt_ops
>> @@ -1036,12 +1037,6 @@ static inline pte_t raw_ptep_get_and_cle
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_PAE */
>>
>> -/* Lazy mode for batching updates / context switch */
>> -#define PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE 0
>> -#define PARAVIRT_LAZY_MMU 1
>> -#define PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU 2
>> -#define PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH 3
>> -
>> #define __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_CPU_MODE
>> static inline void arch_enter_lazy_cpu_mode(void)
>> {
>>
>
> Is the subject for this right?
Yes. As part of the documentation I converted the #defines to enums,
but at some point it clashed with the patch which added PARAVIRT_LAZY_FLUSH.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
