Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6

Willy Tarreau wrote:

..
Contrarily to most people, I don't see them as competitors. I see SD as
a first step with a low risk of regression, and CFS as an ultimate
solution relying on a more solid framework.


I see SD as 100% chance of regression on my main machine.

But I will retest (on Monday?) with the latest, just to see
if it has improved closer to mainline or not.

-ml
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 suspend bug. [kernel/kthread.c]
Next by Date: Re: Why ask Sun for ZFS while we have ReiserFS4 !?
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]