* Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know if Mike still has problems with SD, but there are now
> several interesting reports of SD giving better feedback than CFS on
> real work. In my experience, CFS seems smoother on *technical* tests,
> which I agree that they do not really simulate real work.
well, there are several reports of CFS being significantly better than
SD on a number of workloads - and i know of only two reports where SD
was reported to be better than CFS: in Kasper's test (where i'd like to
know what the "3D stuff" he uses is and take a good look at that
workload), and another 3D report which was done against -v6. (And even
in these two reports the 'smoothness advantage' was not dramatic. If you
know of any other reports then please let me know!)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
