29 Nis 2007 Paz tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı: > > [...] and there were no regression instead of my daydreams) or im too > > tired to understand the differences. > > could the CPU have dropped speed for that bootup (some CPUs do that > automatically upon overheating), or perhaps if you are using some RAID > array, could it have done a background resync? Especially the bootup > slowdown you saw seemed significant, and because bootup speed is 90% IO > dominated, the CPU scheduler seems an unlikely candidate. It could some overheating problem but i think if it is, this is the first time it occurs :), and i don't have any array, SAMSUNG HM120JC IDE disk works on SONY VAIO FS-215B. I just boot with plain CFSv7 and boot time seems normal; Apr 29 15:02:54 (up 10.72) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit Apr 29 15:03:02 (up 17.26) /sbin/mudur.py boot Apr 29 15:03:06 (up 21.34) /sbin/mudur.py default I'll report if i can find any reproducable problem, so far CFSv7 works as expected :) Cheers -- S.Çağlar Onur <[email protected]> http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/ Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: oops in 2.6.21.1 after bringing up the network
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Index(es):
 |