28 Nis 2007 Cts tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı: > * S.Çağlar Onur <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you want some more output/info etc. please just say, i have both v6 > > and v7 available. > > could you try the auto-renice patch ontop of -v7: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-auto-renice.patch > > does this make it behave like -v6? Ingo, please ignore my first report until i found a proper way to reproduce the slowness cause currently CFS-v7, CFS-v7 + "renice patch", CFS-v7 + renice + your private mail suggestions and CFS-v6 + "PI support for futexes patch" seems works equally (which is a good thing so X renicing seems really not needed, and there were no regression instead of my daydreams) or im too tired to understand the differences. -- S.Çağlar Onur <[email protected]> http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/ Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.21
- Next by Date: Re: Back to the future.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
- Index(es):
 |