On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 13:11 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:30:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
<snip>
> Contrarily to most people, I don't see them as competitors. I see SD as
> a first step with a low risk of regression, and CFS as an ultimate
> solution relying on a more solid framework.
>
See this is the part i dont understand, what makes CFS the ultimate
solution compared to SD?
<snip>
>
> Willy
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]