Re: Back to the future.

Hi.

Just to let you know - I'm not ignoring your message. It's just taking
some time to think through the issues and try to formulate a good reply.
Oh, and of course there are a gazillion other messages flying about at
the moment that need attention too.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • Back to the future.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Xavier Bestel <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Back to the future.
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Back to the future.
• Next by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] UIO patches for 2.6.21
• Previous by thread: Re: Back to the future.
• Next by thread: Re: Back to the future.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]