Re: Back to the future.

Hi.

Just to let you know - I'm not ignoring your message. It's just taking
some time to think through the issues and try to formulate a good reply.
Oh, and of course there are a gazillion other messages flying about at
the moment that need attention too.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Back to the future.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Xavier Bestel <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Back to the future.
  - From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Back to the future.
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] UIO patches for 2.6.21
Previous by thread: Re: Back to the future.
Next by thread: Re: Back to the future.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]