On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
> Won't there be problems if e.g. X tries to write something to its
> logfile after snapshot ?
Sure. But that's a user-level issue.
You do have to allow writing after snapshotting, since at a minimum, you'd
want the snapshot itself to be written. So the kernel has to be fully
running, and support full user space. No "degraded mode" like now.
So when I said "fully running user mode", I really meant it from the
perspective of the kernel - not necessarily from the perspective of the
"user". You do want to limit _what_ user mode does, but you must not limit
it by making the kernel less capable.
Remounting mounted filesystems read-only sounds like a good idea, for
example. We can do that. We have the technology. But we shouldn't limit
user space from doing other things (for example, it might want to actually
*mount* a new filesystem for writing the snapshot image).
For example, right now we try to "fix" that with the whole process freezer
thing. And that code has *caused* more problems than it fixed, since it
tries to freeze all the kernel threads etc, and you simply don't have a
truly *working*system*.
I think it's fine to freeze processes if that is what you want to do (for
example, send them SIGSTOP), but we freeze them *too*much* right now, and
the suspend stuff has taken over policy way too much. We don't actually
leave the system in a runnable state. I can almost guarantee that you'd be
*better* off having the snapshot taking thing do a
kill(-1, SIGSTOP);
in user space than our current broken process freezer. At least that
wouldn't have screwed up those kernel threads as badly as swsusp did.
And no, I'm not saying that my suggestion is the only way to do it. Go
wild. But the *current* situation is just broken. Three different things,
none of which people can agree on. I'd *much* rather see a conceptually
simpler approach that then required, but even more important is that right
now people aren't even discussing alternatives, they're just pushing one
of the three existing things, and that's simply not viable. Because I'm
not merging another one.
In fact, I personally feel that I shouldn't even have merged
userspace-swsusp, but if Andrew thinks it needs to be merged, my personal
feelings simply don't matter that much. I have to trust people. But yes,
as far as *I* am personally concerned, I think it was a mistake to merge
it.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
