On Thu, Apr 26 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > The above can be implemented fairly cleanly, and on a need-to-have > > basis. It's not something that'll break drivers. > > But its also not going to fix the hacks that we have in the kernel > to deal with > PAGE_SIZE i/o. No, but that's a _seperate_ issue! Don't keep mixing up the two. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- References:
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Prev by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.21
- Previous by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Next by thread: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
- Index(es):
 |