On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:03:58PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Iff we really the larger physical page size to support the hardware
> > > then it makes sense to go down a path of larger pages. But it doesn't.
> >
> > You are redefining the problem. We need larger physical sizes to support
> > the hardware. Yes. We can dodge the issue with shim layers and hacks. It
> > is obvious from the kernel sources that this is needed.
>
> We definitely don't. Larger sizes are ONE way to solve the problem, they
> are definitely not the only one. If the larger pages become unfeasible
> for some reason (be it fragmentation, or just because the design isn't
> good), then we can solve it differently.
Exactly. But the only counter-proposal we have so far seems far worse :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
