Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Yes, probably will. The other option is to break existing 32-bit
> userspace, which is a bit more common AFAICT.

And *this* is why kernel/userspace things simply should not be done.

It's simply better to do things entirely in the kernel. Because you add 
bugs and complications otherwise, and doing it in the kernel allows you 
to just switch things around.

As it is, it appears that user-space suspend is just broken whichever way 
we turn.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
• Next by Date: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
• Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Next by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]