Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Or good grounds to increase the sg limit and push for io controller
> manufacturers to do the same. If we have a hack in the kernel that
> mostly works, they won't.

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Page colouring was always rejected, and lots of people who knew
> better got upset because it was the only way the hardware would go
> fast...

Yes, stunning wisdom there. Reject the speedups.


On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> You could put it that way. Or that it is wrong because of the
> fragmenatation problem. Realise that it is somewhat fundamental
> considering that it is basically an unsolvable problem with our
> current kernel assumptions of unconstrained kernel allocations and
> a 1:1 kernel mapping.

Depends on what you consider a solution. A broadly used criterion is
that improves performance significantly in important usage cases.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux