On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > But ... you are really using suspend-to-disk as a workaround for "my > desktop takes too much power when idle". While rare is the day admittedly, that my machine isn't on, there are days I take a break from loooong days and won't work for 2-5 days at a time. My main revenue machine is a laptop with a fast, but last-generation mobile processor and 2GB of DDR2 SDRAM. I think it's ridiculous to expect that I could resume off battery (and this thing is a behemoth, with a 17" screen and backlight and a lot of little juice-eating peripherals that'll go thru a 4.4A/Hr battery in a little over 90 mins, even with conservative power settings) after that kind of delay. I don't even like "suspend to RAM, then suspend to disk on battery low" 'cause that means when I turn it on again I have a low battery for an hour and a half. The only acceptable power usage when (completely) idle, IMO, is *zero*. -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Christian Hesse <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: For debugging, make the initial page table setup less forgiving.
- Next by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Next by thread: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
- Index(es):