On Wednesday 18 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christian Hesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > i took a quick look at suspend2 and it makes some use of yield(). > > > There's a bug in CFS's yield code, i've attached a patch that should > > > fix it, does it make any difference to the hang? > > > > This patch should apply cleanly against what? The second hunk is > > ignored as it has already been applied. Is this correct? > > hm, i think you might have had one of the earlier CFS patches. You are right. > > But no, it does not change anything. Let me know if you have any other > > patches to test. > > could you try the -v3 patch i released a few hours ago: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/ > > although probably your suspend2 problem is still not fixed, it's worth a > try nevertheless. Which suspend2 patch did you apply, and was it against > -rc6 or -rc7? You are right again. ;-) Linux 2.6.21-rc7 Suspend2 2.2.9.11 (applies cleanly to -rc7) CFS v3 (without any additional patches) And it still hangs on suspend. -- Regards, Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- References:
- [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Christian Hesse <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Next by Date: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- Previous by thread: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- Next by thread: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy
- Index(es):
 |