Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please ask anyone who's worked with me if he's had any problem with that.
> If anyone say I'm unable to work with anybody else, I'd say you're right.  Till
> then, I feel offended.

I'll apologise (and virtually kiss your hairy feet) if you could actually 
show me a single implementation that people can agree on.

But until then, I claim that the suspend-to-disk people cannot work with 
each other.

And no, "three different implementations" doesn't cut it. Even _two_ is 
too much. We need to get *rid* of something, not add more.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux