Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation

> > To summarize the outstanding issues are:
> > - fixing sched_clock first
> >   
> 
> What was the sched_clock problem?  I don't remember and outstanding
> issues with it.  I noticed you didn't take paravirt-sched_clock.

The major problem was that it didn't compile on x86-64.
And a few uglities in there so I was not too unhappy to drop.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [KERNEL-DOC] kill warnings when building mandocs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]