Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:41:23 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> ... will review the rest later.
> >>     
> >
> > Rest is ok
> >   
> 
> Thanks for looking at it.  I'll try to separate xen-core into more
> digestable pieces.

For me you don't need anymore, but possibly for others.

To summarize the outstanding issues are:
- fixing sched_clock first
- hopefully more review of the core pieces by others
- what i commented (minor stuff mostly)
- review of xenbus and drivers
[i did upto the grant table code, but not more] 


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation II
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/16] AF_RXRPC socket family and AFS rewrite [try #3]
• Next by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation II
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]