Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> ... will review the rest later.
>>     
>
> Rest is ok
>   

Thanks for looking at it.  I'll try to separate xen-core into more
digestable pieces.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/25] xen: Xen implementation for paravirt_ops
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.20.7 mss negotiation and path mtu discovery mostly broken?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/25] xen: Core Xen implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]