On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christian Hesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i'm pleased to announce release -v5 of the CFS scheduler patchset. > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > I just noticed that with cfs all processes (except some kernel > > threads) run on cpu 0. I don't think this is expected cpu affinity for > > an smp system? I remember about half of the processes running on each > > core with mainline. > > i've got several SMP systems with CFS and all distribute the load > properly to all CPUs, so it would be nice if you could tell me more > about how the problem manifests itself on your system. > > for example, if you start two infinite loops: > > for (( N=0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done > > do they end up on the same CPU? > > Or do you mean that the default placement of single tasks starts at > CPU#0, while with mainline they were alternating? That was not your fault. I updated suspend2 to 2.2.9.13 and everything works as expected again. Sorry for the noise. -- Regards, Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, v4
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- From: Christian Hesse <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] CFS scheduler, v4
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] Performance Stats: Kernel patch
- Next by Date: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.21-rc6-git5 in cfq_dispatch_insert
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
- Index(es):
 |