Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
From: Christian Hesse <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:54:43 +0200
Cc: [email protected], Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Con Kolivas <[email protected]>, Nick Piggin <[email protected]>, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>, Peter Williams <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>, [email protected], Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>, Gene Heskett <[email protected]>, Mark Lord <[email protected]>, Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6

On Monday 23 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm pleased to announce release -v5 of the CFS scheduler patchset.

Hi Ingo,

I just noticed that with cfs all processes (except some kernel threads) run on 
cpu 0. I don't think this is expected cpu affinity for an smp system? I 
remember about half of the processes running on each core with mainline.
-- 
Regards,
Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] CFS scheduler, v4
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Renice X for cpu schedulers
Next by Date: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux