Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.

On Monday April 23, [email protected] wrote:
> Would this work? Contains a solution somewhat along the lines of your 
> thoughts on the subject.
> 

Concept seems sound.
Code needs a kfree of the name returned by create_unique_id, and I
think ID_STR_LENGTH needs to be at least 34.
Maybe that should be allocated on the stack in sysfs_slab_add, rather
than using kmalloc/free.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question about Reiser4
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Return EPERM not ECHILD on security_task_wait failure
• Previous by thread: Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
• Next by thread: Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]