On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday April 19, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure how best to fix this one.... kmem_cache_destroy currently
> > > doesn't know which alias is being destroyed.
> >
> > The aliases are there for decorative purposes when running without
> > debugging. If one switches on debugging then it matters but then the
> > symlinks are not created since there will be no aliases.
> >
> > I guess we can ignore the problem?
>
> Maybe....
> But then if we create the same cache with a different size, we might
> need to create a directory in sysfs, but there is already a symlink
> there...
> It doesn't feel very clean.
Right. Sigh. But there is no user of the symlinks.
I could drop the symlinks completely. Just do not track what names a cache
aliases to?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
