Re: [PATCH] utilities: add helper functions for safe 64-bit integer operations as 32-bit halves

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:06:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:01:47 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > > > +#define lower_32_bits(n) (sizeof(n) == 8 ? (u32)(n) : (n))
> > > 
> > > n&0xffffffff would be simpler.
> > > 
> > > Do we actually have any call for this?
> > 
> > The only case for all of this we care about is sector_t, which is one
> > type, with specific properties (eg always being positive). The rest is
> > over-engineering. Call it sector_upper32() do it the simple way and stop
> > trying to solve a problem we don't have
> 
> James said we have the same problem with dma_addr_t.

Yes.  It's in fact the far more common case and we have a bread of
macros dealing with the issue in various drivers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/