On Apr 21, 2007, at 12:18, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Also, I believe that (in shells), most forked processes do not even
consume
a full timeslice (eg: $(uname -n) is very fast). This means that
assigning
them with a shorter one will not hurt them while preserving the
shell's
performance against CPU hogs.
On a fast machine, during regression testing of GCC, I've noticed we
create
an average of 500 processes per second during an hour or so. There
are other
work loads like this. So, most processes start, execute and complete
in 2ms.
How does fairness work in a situation like this?
-Geert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
