Am 21.04.2007 15:11 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: [...] >> Removing isdn4linux would constitute a serious regression. > > i know. believe me, i *know that*, since i'm fairly sure it was my > observation that initially started that discussion about isdn4linux. Sure. I didn't want to suggest otherwise. Sorry if I did. > i did make it clear in that previous post that all i was doing was > listing stuff in the source tree that is currently marked with > "obsolete" or something like that, with no regard to any discussion > that's taken place about it recently. Of course, and thanks for that. But I can't just let it stand uncommented, can I? People might start believing isdn4linux *was* obsolete because "it was on that list of obsolete items, and nobody protested." > all i was interested in was feedback along the lines of, "oh, yeah, > *that* feature is thoroughly dead and can be tossed," nothing more. Right. So please don't feel annoyed by my reply. Just take it as a feedback of "*that* feature definitely isn't dead". Thanks Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- other potentially deletable, dead stuff
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- other potentially deletable, dead stuff
- Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/8] account user mounts
- Previous by thread: Re: other potentially deletable, dead stuff
- Next by thread: [PATCH] cxacru: Add Documentation file
- Index(es):
 |