Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, David Chinner wrote:

> I think PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is a redundant define with these
> modifications.  The page cache size in now variable and it is based
> on a multiple of PAGE_SIZE. Hence I suggest that PAGE_CACHE_SIZE and
> it's derivitives should be made to go away completely with this
> change.

Ultimately we should do so but for right now lets stay on the least-
intrusive and as-clean-as-possible road.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
  - From: "Adam Litke" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
  - From: David Chinner <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]