Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages

On 4/19/07, Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:

@@ -331,11 +331,15 @@ int simple_prepare_write(struct file *fi
                        unsigned from, unsigned to)
 {
        if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
-               if (to - from != PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
+               if (to - from != page_cache_size(file->f_mapping)) {

Where do you introduce page_cache_size()?  Is this added by a
different set of patches I should have applied first?

--
Adam Litke ( agl at us.ibm.com )
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mm: count unstable pages per BDI
• Previous by thread: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]