Re: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?

Marat Buharov wrote:
> from fs/udf/super.c:
> in function udf_fill_super
> sb->s_maxbytes = 1<<30; (1 GB)
> 
> Why sb->s_maxbytes is not equal to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE?
> 

Patches to fix that are in the -mm kernel already (and in
Fedora Core 6 latest update.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

References:
- why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?
  - From: "Marat Buharov" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
Next by Date: Re: Dropping CONFIG_REORDER on x86-64 for 2.6.22
Previous by thread: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?
Next by thread: Re: why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]