why UDF have so ugly filesize limit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



from fs/udf/super.c:
in function udf_fill_super
sb->s_maxbytes = 1<<30; (1 GB)

Why sb->s_maxbytes is not equal to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE?

So, in include/linux/fs.h written that the filesystems should put that
(MAX_LFS_FILESIZE) into their s_maxbytes, otherwise bad things can
happen in VM.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux