On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:
> > Hmmmm.... Sorry. I got distracted and I have sent them to Kame-san who was
> > interested in working on them.
> > I have placed the most recent version at
> > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/cpuset_dirty
> >
>
> Do you expect any conflicts with the per-bdi dirty throttling patches?
You would have to check that yourself. The need for cpuset aware writeback
is less due to writeback fixes to NFS. The per bdi dirty throttling is
further reducing the need. The role of the cpuset aware writeback is
simply to implement measures to deal with the worst case scenarios.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
