> In order to keep raising the standard for comparison for the alternative new > scheduler developments, here is an updated version of the staircase deadline > cpu scheduler. I very much appreciate your continued work on SD. Over the last days I had used 26.21-rc7-ck1 and -ck2. Today I have given sd0.42 a try and my system "feels" more responsive with my everyday tasks. No hard facts just my very subjective usage experience. I'm on an Intel Core2 T7600 2.33GHz, 4GB, openSUSE 10.2, KDE Workload are occasional compilejobs as well as regular Perl numbercrunching scripts while having amarok playing music. No noticeable desktop freezes or anything else. With -ck1/2 I had occasional visual freezes/delays. I think I still like SD better than the "old" -ck. I'll give 2.6.21-rc7-sd0.43 a try later today (i.e. when it has finished been built). Best, Michael -- Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: [email protected] GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Attachment:
pgptOll7aceg1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.43
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.43
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 1/2] Input: ff, add FF_RAW effect
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
- Previous by thread: [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.43
- Next by thread: Kernel OOPS:Badness in map_area_pte at mm/vmalloc.c:126 - Why should it misbehave? Linux 2.6.11
- Index(es):
 |