* Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> wrote:
> > as usual, any sort of feedback, bugreports, fixes and suggestions
> > are more than welcome,
>
> Pushed this through the test.kernel.org and nothing new blew up.
> Notably the kernbench figures are within expectations even on the
> bigger numa systems, commonly badly affected by balancing problems in
> the schedular.
thanks! Given the really low preemption latency/granularity default
(roughly equivalent to 'timeslice length'), and that basically all of my
focus was on interactivity characteristics, this is a pretty good
result. I suspect it will be necessary to increase the default to 10
msecs (or more) to be on the safe side. (Nick has reported a 4%
kernbench drop so for his kernbench workload it's needed.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
