On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:40:54 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > If the obsolete tag is to be removed then it needs a formal maintainer, > all the obsolete interface usage cleaning up and the like otherwise at > some point in a clean up it is going to end up breaking and migrating to > && BROKEN as well. I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean by "obsolete interface usage"? What sort of cleaning up needs to be done? What sort of breakage do you anticipate in the event of a clean up? Thanks Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- References:
- so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/12] libata: allocate ap separately from shost
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci-quirks: disable MSI on RS400-200 and RS480
- Previous by thread: Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- Next by thread: Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?
- Index(es):
 |