Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?

[Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>]

Am 15.04.2007 22:55 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
>   as i recall, the isdn4linux was *un*obsoleted, wasn't it?

Actually, it wasn't.

We *did* reach a consensus that isdn4linux is not obsolete in the
accepted sense of the word, because there is no replacement for it
so far.

OTOH I have since submitted (twice, in fact) a patch that would remove
the "(obsolete)" label from the Kconfig entry, but somehow nothing
ever became of it. My submissions just linger in LKML, uncommented and
unmerged.

To sum it up, we agree that the "(obsolete)" label is wrong, but we
won't remove it. I have no idea how to resolve that situation.

What I do know is that it would be very wrong to remove isdn4linux,
because it has an existing userbase with nowhere else to go.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                                  E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Wehrhausweg 66                                  Fax: +49 228 4299019
53227 Bonn
Germany

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature