Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:37:01AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> 
> BTW, here are figures I got with 2 different versions of the driver
> when using tcrypt module. The second being the result with the
> optimized driver (no key reloading on each block):
> 
> normal version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 67991 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> optimized version:
> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 51783 cycles (8192 
> bytes)
> 
> So the gain is 16000 cycles which seems to worth the change, isn't it ?

Sounds like it would.  It would help of course if you posted the patch :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux