On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:24 +0800, Zhou Yingchao wrote:
> When we run a two nfs client and a nfs server in the following way, we
> met a livelock / starvation condition.
>
> MachineA MachineB
> Client1 Client2
> Server
>
> As shown in the figure, we run a client and server on one machine, and
> run another client on another machine. When Client1 and Client2 make
> many writes at the same time, the Client1's request is blocked until
> Client2's writes finished.
>
> We check the code, Client1 is blocked in generic_file_write-> ...
> >balance_dirty_pages, balance_dirty_pages call writeback_inodes to
> (only) flush data of the related fs.
>
> In nfs, we found that the Server has enhanced its dirty_thresh. So in
> the loop of writeback_inodes, Client1 has no data to write out, and
> the condition "ns_reclaimable+wbs.nr_writeback<=dirty_thresh" will not
> be true until Client2 finishes its write request to Server. So the
> loop will only end after Client2 finished its write job.
>
> The problem in this path is: why we write only pages of the related fs
> in writeback_inodes but check the dirty thresh for total pages?
I am working on patches to fix this.
Current version at (against -mm):
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/balance_dirty_pages/
However, after a rewrite of the BDI statistics work there are some
funnies, which I haven't had time to analyse yet :-/
I hope to post a new version soonish...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
