When we run a two nfs client and a nfs server in the following way, we
met a livelock / starvation condition.
MachineA MachineB
Client1 Client2
Server
As shown in the figure, we run a client and server on one machine, and
run another client on another machine. When Client1 and Client2 make
many writes at the same time, the Client1's request is blocked until
Client2's writes finished.
We check the code, Client1 is blocked in generic_file_write-> ...
balance_dirty_pages, balance_dirty_pages call writeback_inodes to
(only) flush data of the related fs.
In nfs, we found that the Server has enhanced its dirty_thresh. So in
the loop of writeback_inodes, Client1 has no data to write out, and
the condition "ns_reclaimable+wbs.nr_writeback<=dirty_thresh" will not
be true until Client2 finishes its write request to Server. So the
loop will only end after Client2 finished its write job.
The problem in this path is: why we write only pages of the related fs
in writeback_inodes but check the dirty thresh for total pages?
--
Yingchao Zhou
***********************************************
Institute Of Computing Technology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
***********************************************
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
